The world is embroiled in a pandemic of a new coronavirus at the end of 2019 and early in 2020, with such a large scale that it has severely involved the political, economic, and social systems in most countries around the world. The scale of the crisis is so widespread that many experts believe that the post-corona world will be substantially different from the pre-corona world. In the face of this massive epidemic, how people perceive risk and how to risk is communicated, plays a central role in deciding and choosing people's behavior. Fighting with this emerging phenomenon requires mobilizing all the possibilities of society and helping all people in the field of empathy and altruism. In this article, we briefly review aspects of the important concept of risk perception and Communication in this pervasive crisis.

Objective: One of the challenges of Communication research is the lack of definition of "pattern" and "model" among Iranian researchers. Some researchers do not differentiate between pattern and model.Method: In this research, which was done with the library method and analytical-descriptive method.Results: The results of the research showed: the definition of pattern and model are two separate definitions. Pattern drawing is specific to research that lacks theoretical foundations, and the researcher, in order to create a theory that is the theoretical support of his quantitative research, first by specifying the main concepts of the research, he proposes "relationships between concepts" based on the researcher's lived experiences and studies in the form of a mental model, and then in the mixed method uses quantitative method to confirm the pattern to arrive at the pattern. Conclusions: The pattern is the result of qualitative method and the model is the result of quantitative methods that shows the "relationships between variables" with numbers and figures resulting from the use of statistics in research. There are different types of models, such as: 1-combination of theories 2-compatibility of theories 3-typology and 4-modelling; Iranian researchers base most of their work on the type of modeling, perhaps the mistakes that researchers make are due to the lack of knowledge of all types of models.

Communication and effective date of electronic judicial measure are among the important issues. In electronic Communication, the relevant regulations are in some ways inconsistent with the rules. The nature of this Communication is ambiguous,Beneficiary of the regulations, hearing the statement of ignorance of the provisions of electronic Communication is subject to proof, accepting the excuse of not being informed applies, With the silence of the existing regulations, assuming the difference in date, in principle, the date of receipt of the Communication in the system, which is the first date, should be considered the date of Communication, unless the addressee proves lack of access to the system. In many cases, judicial action is limited to a deadline (legal or judicial) or the passage of time. In addition to the possibility of acting outside office hours, if the beneficiary is denied the opportunity to act within the deadline due to reasons not appropriate to the beneficiary, his right will be lost in accordance with the existing regulations. This is an unfair approach and contrary to the rights of citizens.

Background: One of the features of Mission Based Management is measuring the activities of faculty members and departments and their contributions to the school's mission. As it is important to assess the school's readiness for such a system, in this study we assessed the viewpoints of Tehran Medical School's department chairs about faculty members’ activities.Methods: We used focus group technique to identify participants' viewpoints. We divided 30 department chairs into homogenous groups of 4-6. After a brief introduction, the moderator presented questions to determine the participants' idea and a secretary recorded them. We categorized viewpoints into main themes and subthemes.Results: Ninety three percent of chairs participated in the sessions. Department chairs' viewpoints were categorized into 3 main themes: "system is effective and important", "system is effective and important but some challenges should be considered" and "system is ineffective and should not be implemented". Subthemes included chairs' concerns, views, fears and reasons.Conclusions: The results of the study provided reliable information about department chairs' concerns and reactions to this system. Finally, we determined points of strengths and anticipated threats for developing a faculty member activity measurement system.